Loading...
Answer a few questions about denials, underpayments, cancellations, and visibility. You will receive a preliminary leakage profile before speaking with anyone.
Step 1. Practice profile
Pain management practices often need visibility across authorization, payer behavior, procedural volume, and cancellation-driven capacity loss.
Used only to understand practice scale. The assessment does not estimate dollars.
Used to recommend the most relevant benchmark report or report request path.
Step 2. Revenue integrity concerns
We do not have a clean enough view to know.
We do not have a clean enough view to know.
We see issues, but they are not consistently quantified.
Some reporting exists, but the full answer is fragmented.
What this assessment is doing
This assessment does not calculate confirmed leakage. It creates a preliminary profile from your inputs so your leadership team can see which revenue integrity questions may deserve attention first.
Preliminary profile
Your highest-priority area to examine appears to be Denial Leakage.
Primary area to examine first
Denial Leakage
This profile is based on your inputs. It is not calculated from claims, payment, or scheduling files. Prexisio confirms actual leakage only after reviewing practice data.
Denial leakage
High
Underpayment exposure
High
Cancellation impact
Moderate
Visibility gap
Moderate
Denial leakage
High
Underpayment exposure
High
Cancellation impact
Moderate
Visibility gap
Moderate
What this suggests
Denial leakage should be examined first because recurring denials can point to preventable breakdowns in authorization, eligibility, documentation, coding, payer behavior, or front-end workflows.